In most deliberative rhetoric, the focus is on expediency, on technical criteria as a means to an end.
But here expediency and the resulting
ethos of objectivity, logic, and narrow focus that characterize most technical writing, are taken to the extremes and applied to the mass destruction of human beings.
Here, expediency is an ethical end as well (p. 197).
What does expediency mean?
Katz suggests it is the ethic of expediency that enables deliberative rhetoric and gives impulse to most of our actions in technological capitalism as well, and he explores some of the implications and dangers of a rhetoric grounded exclusively in an ethic of expediency.
Katz asserts science and technology become the basis of a powerful ethical argument for carrying out any program (p. 203).
Technology becomes a means and an ends in itself (p. 204).
“Technological rationality” calculates the value of everything in terms of its own technical criteria and use, supplants and replaces the traditional values of the society (p. 204).
Technical rationality is based on expediency.
In our culture, the danger is that technological expediency can become the only basis of happiness, can become a virtue in itself, and so subsume all ethics under it, making all ethics expedients and thus replacing them.
To some extent, technological expediency is the moral basis of many decisions/actions in our society that sometimes harm human welfare or imperil human life.
Can you name any examples besides the ones mentioned in Katz's article?
In any highly bureaucratic, technological, capitalistic society, it is often the human being who must adapt to the system which has been developed to perform a specific function, and which is thus always necessarily geared toward the continuance of its own efficient operation.
In a capitalistic society, technological expediency often takes precedence over human convenience, and sometimes even human life (p. 207).
When expediency becomes an end in itself or is coupled with personal or political or corporate or scientific or technological goals that are not also and ultimately rooted in humanitarian concerns, as is often the case, ethical problems arise (p. 208).
Have you experienced anything like this before in your previous work experience?